Here’s a Thought: Have Quincy Patterson pass

Go through just about every single thread on the Rutgers’ fan base board and you will find a lot of predictions.

I found three to be particularly amusing:

Rutgers, 69-0. Rutgers 51-3 and, lastly but by no means least, Rutgers, 92-3. Not a single one picked Temple to win.

Rutgers’ fans full of themselves?

Shocked I tell ya. Shocked.

It’s pretty much the Mets’ fanbase of college football. They think their team is a whole lot better than it is.

Always have. Always will.

I do remember a game where I had a transistor radio in one hand and my program in the other walking into Rutgers Stadium in the otherwise regrettable Bobby Wallace Error.

Listening to the pre-game show, I heard the Rutgers’ color guy tell the Rutgers’ play-by-play guy this: “Let’s face it: Rutgers should never lose to Temple.”

“Who the hell do they think they are?” I thought, almost tossing my radio along the road.

Temple won that game, 48-14, and the quarterback for the Owls, Mike Frost, became a successful bartender on campus and later head manager of the Draught Horse.

A couple of years later, Temple was kicked out of the Big East for “non-competitiveness” but a less competitive team, Rutgers–who the Owls had beaten four-straight years–was allowed to stay.

After that announcement, Temple beat Rutgers 20-17, on a Cap Poklemba field goal in the rain and that was a night when a terrific back named Tanardo Sharps ran 48 times for 246 yards. Once that game was over, the entire 55-man Owl traveling team went over and danced on the Rutgers’ Big East logo and sang “T for Temple U.” Joe Klecko and I tailgated with a small group of our friends before and after.

The beers never tasted better.

Now Temple plays Rutgers tomorrow (7:30 p.m., Big 10 Network) and a lot of those same assumptions are still in place.

Temple should never beat Rutgers (according to RU fans) despite the fact that Temple hung with two teams arguably better than RU in the final games of last season, Houston (42-35) and ECU (49-46). Owls lost both games in the last 1:22 but probably should have won both. At the same time, Rutgers was being beaten up by Penn State (55-10) and Maryland (37-0).

Yes, the same Penn State program that lost, 27-10, to Temple in 2015 and the same Maryland program that lost to Temple in consecutive pre-Covid seasons, 35-14 (in College Park) and 20-17. That last Temple win over the Terps came in the same year Maryland beat RU, 48-7.

But Rutgers should never lose to Temple. Right.

Beginning our official picks this week against the spread. Really like a Cincy team that put up 66 on Eastern Kentucky over a Pitt team that scored 45 on a worse Wofford team.

We do know two more things: Both Temple and Rutgers have highly paid professional coaches who have studied the tendencies of the opposite team so much that they are ready.

The team that throws a wrench into those preparations by showing the bad guys something they haven’t seen is probably the one that will win.

Throws being the operative word and Temple being that team.

If there has been one predictable pattern about the Owls for the last two years, it has been whenever backup quarterback Quincy Patterson comes into the game it’s almost always on short yardage situations and it pretty much is a run on every play call. Patterson always comes in about four plays a game and those four plays are always short-yardage runs.

That hasn’t fooled many people.

The one time Temple was courageous enough to break that pattern, Quincy threw a jump pass to the tight end for a touchdown in a 49-46 loss to bowl-bound East Carolina in the final game of last season. Temple head coach Stan Drayton has praised Patterson for the last nine months by saying his passing game has improved substantially. It’s time to let that baby exit the birth canal and for Stan to put his -8.5 money where his mouth is.

In order to beat a team like RU, Temple is going to have to show Greg Schiano what he hasn’t seen on film and what he has seen so far is a Patterson run. He hasn’t seen Patterson put that ball in the belly of a running back, pull it out and toss it downfield for six.

In a game where the line is single digits, a simple thing like a couple of well-timed Patterson passes in short yardage could be enough to put Temple over the top.

Any other surprises will have to be cooked up by the Temple coaches. They know what they’ve shown Schiano on tape so far. The more new wrinkles they show the better their chances will be.

Sunday: Game Analysis

9 thoughts on “Here’s a Thought: Have Quincy Patterson pass

  1. Mike, First lets hope that we catch the ball. From my Temple Football alums that watched the game vs Akron, that was the common discourse. Back to your “throw a wrinkle” concept. Coach Hardin always had 1-2 wrinkles every week, offensively or/and on special teams. That was one of the distinct Hardin coaching memories I still have. I did not know anything about football in 1973, but I watched everything around me, the players and coaches when I wasn’t kicking. It team’s spirit and concentration rose a notch at practice when that week’s special play was practiced. The wrinkle play is designed to throw the opponent off balance, alter the game tempo. Like the “Philly Special”, but this was a “Hardin Thing”. The other coaches always knew Hardin had it coming their way. When and how was the fun of it. Player execution is imperative to win consistently, but creatively is also the ingredient that many coaches under utilize.

    • Sorry I missed you at the Akron game. Funny you mentioned the wrinkles. Talking with Casey Murphy I brought up Casey’s pass to Steve Watson for a touchdown and said that’s one of the many reasons why Hardin was such a great coach. He had no qualms having his punter throw a pass once he determined in practice he could throw. I feel the last wrinkle we saw for Temple was QP fake the run, take a step back and throw that touchdown against ECU. It’s not enough to see it once every other game. Got to throw one or two in there per game.

    • I thought Dante, Zae and Amad caught some pretty tough balls well in traffic. DMR made a nice catch, turned and ran over a couple of people. There were one or two drops but I thought the receivers had a good day. The bad day was the offensive line. No push whatsoever.

    • Just a quick hello to you, Don. You don’t know me, but you gave us all plenty of happy moments back in ’75. I was a freshman in the TU band, and the band director assured all of us wide-eyed newbies that this great football team was headed to the Sugar Bowl that year. It was a great time. Met my wife in the band. Go Owls!

  2. Yes, a wrench would be nice, but consistent intensity and execution would be even better. No plays off. Flawless adherence to every detail of the game plan. That’s how you win. My wife is Rutgers alum, so this is a big game here. The Temple flag will be flying outside of my house…somehow, the Rutgers flag will be “misplaced.” And when I fly the flag here in Chapel Hill, I’m sure Mark Macon crosses the mind of some of the neighbors. Go Owls!

  3. Agree. Let Patterson pass and run. Bring him in at critical points and keep the enemy guessing! As for those absurd Rutgers fans’ predictions – sounds like bulletin board material to moi! Go Owls!

  4. Keys to the car, Detroit’s O-line manhandled the Chiefs. What happens when your O-line is one dimensional? You wind up 12th in rushing in a G5 conference.

    https://theamerican.org/stats.aspx?path=football&year=2023

    We should not expect 6 or more wins if we can’t average at least 100 yds rushing, period.

    • OL was bad but the backs have to do a better job at bouncing off that first tackle, making defenders miss and keeping their balance when the sticks are close. Our guys against Akron got one finger on them and went down. Not good.

Leave a reply to Mike Gibson Cancel reply