Keeler and Berndt: TU football’s Lincoln and Kennedy

Jerry Berndt outside McGonigle Hall the day he got hired by Temple.

Very few things cause a human brain to short-circuit but the comparisons between Abraham Lincoln and John F. Kennedy after the latter was tragically assassinated boggled the mind of any student of history.

Here were just a few (there were many more):


Both Lincoln and Kennedy were second children, both boat captains, both elected to Congress in ’47 (18 for Lincoln, 19 for Kennedy) and both VP runners-up in a year ending with 56. Each was elected POTUS in a year ending with 60. Kennedy had a secretary named Lincoln and Lincoln had a secretary named Kennedy. Both Kennedy and Lincoln each contain seven letters.

Temple is probably safe from any Keeler vs. Berndt comparisons.



Each President in his 30s married a socially prominent 24-year-old woman who spoke French fluently.

While in the White House, each President had a family of three children, and both lost a child through death.

Temple football has a more modest comparison between new head coach K.C. Keeler and the architect of the 1990 turnaround, Jerry Berndt.

Temple hired both from a school based near Houston, as Berndt was hired after a head coaching stint at Rice and Keeler after a head coaching stint at Sam Houston State. Both Berndt and Keeler each contain, like Kennedy and Lincoln, the same amount of letters.

Our critique of the Diaz hire on Day One (of 18 days).

Both had success in the Philadelphia area prior to moving to Texas with Berndt winning an Ivy League football title at Penn and Keeler winning titles at Rowan and Delaware.

But if Temple fans even entertain the thought that Keeler will be a redux of Berndt, they should think again.

History supports Keeler in this comparison.

Temple hired Berndt coming off an 0-11 season at Rice. Temple hired Keeler off a 9-3 season at Sam Houston. That Berndt hiring existed long before this blog started but I mentioned to several fellow Temple fans at the time that hiring a guy coming off an 0-11 season was not only a major red flag, but pretty damn stupid.

Unfortunately, I was proven correct–as I was years later in my assessment of both the Manny Diaz and Stan Drayton hirings.

Terrez Worthy might beat out Jay Ducker for Temple’s featured back this season.

Both were negative gut feelings but Keeler has always been a positive one.

That should disabuse any Temple fan of a thought that the Keeler regime will include just one winning season and a lot of losing ones.

That, plus the fact that Keeler won everywhere he went and Berndt didn’t should bode well for the future.

Sometimes being a student of history pays off at the college football betting windows and this is probably one of those times.

We won’t find out until we cash the ticket in December but history is both our guide and our prognosticator and proven to repeat itself.

Monday: ECU and WVU break down Temple’s season

Friday: New Digs New Look

Monday (8/11): Will We Get a Depth Chart?

Helmet change now would be Golden Rhule

The new Western Michigan helmet. I don’t remember what the old one looked like.

Temple helmet records:
T (one year each of Wallace and Golden): 1-22
T (during Berndt and Dickerson): 19-80;
T (during Addazio): 13-11;
Cartoon Owl (seven years under Wallace): 19-60
TEMPLE (final four years of Golden): 26-23
TEMPLE (all of Hardin and Arians): 107-91-3
Total: TEMPLE=133 wins, 114 losses, 3 ties
T=33 wins, 113 losses

Thought it kind of odd that, in the middle of recruiting season, new Western Michigan coach P.J. Fleck introduced a new helmet.
I thought new coaches were in a full-out sprint to firm up and add to recruiting classes and didn’t have time to address a pursuit as trivial (by comparison) as helmets.
Now they do.
I hope Matt Rhule does.
An established tradition at Temple is that a new helmet is solely the call of a new head coach.
Wayne Hardin changed the helmet from the stupid Owl to TEMPLE and the Owls won like never before. Bruce Arians wisely kept the TEMPLE and had the Owls go 6-5 (twice) against a Top 10 national schedule. Try picturing current-day Temple going 6-5 twice against a SEC schedule. That’s pretty much what Arians did.
Jerry Berndt changed the TEMPLE helmet to the T and the Owls promptly went 1-10. Bad Karma.

“The 2007 helmet brings us back to the most successful TEAM period in the history of Temple football.”
_Al Golden

The T took TEMPLE through some awful Ron Dickerson and Bobby Wallace years. Heck, Wallace even changed the helmet to the comedic (joke on us) cartoon Owl for awhile, before ending his tenure with the T.
Al Golden changed all that with some good coaching … and good Karma.
The winning Temple teams that Al Golden remembered had the word TEMPLE on the helmet and he mentioned branding as the reason he changed back to the TEMPLE helmet after his first season.
“There are several reasons for the change,” Golden said. “The first is for our current team to discover our tradition. The 2007 helmet brings us back to the most successful TEAM period in the history of Temple Football; a time that produced a 10-game winner and a final Top 20 ranking in both polls. The second reason is quite simply branding. When I was growing up in New Jersey, Temple’s helmets were unique. It was the most recognizable helmet in the East, let alone the country. Somewhere along the way that got lost, so I wanted to bring it back. The last reason has to do with our overall football operation. Our goal is to be first in every endeavor that we believe impacts our football team. We now feel like we have the best uniform, not only in the MAC, but on the East Coast. We have our brand back and it is here to stay.”

The greatest helmet in the history of college football, IMHO.

The move was universally applauded, especially by ex-Temple players.
I thought that was great and made TEMPLE stand out from other Ts on other helmets, like Tennessee and Tulane.
We all know and love our Temple ‘][‘ but, really, how many non-Temple people located in Idaho or Montana or Washington or even Tennessee can tell that’s a Temple ‘][‘ right away?
Not many, I’d venture to say.
In the grand scheme of things, a helmet change is not all that important but, considering the amount of winning TEMPLE did under the TEMPLE brand and losing under the T brand, I think it’s called for now.
The attitude inside the helmet is much more important than the lettering on the outside, but I’m proud of being from TEMPLE and I think both the T and the TEMPLE branding should be a consideration when designing the new helmet.

There is a King Solomon-like solution here and I hope that Rhule has the wisdom to see it:

Split the baby in half.
Put TEMPLE on one side and the ‘][‘ on the other.
That way you have the branding concerns by marketing taken care of and you salute the greatest helmet era in TEMPLE history by putting it on the other half of the helmet. Heck, having TEMPLE on the other side of the helmet enhances and not detracts, from the ‘][‘ brand because of the constant reminder of what the ‘][‘ stands for on every tackle, interception or touchdown.
You leave no doubt as to what school the T stands for and you have the most unique and best helmet in college football.
Then keep it that way for a long, long time.

Temple Helmet Records

Temple T
Cartoon Owl
TEMPLE
One year Golden=1-11
7 years Wallace=19-60
Hardin (13 years)=80-52-3
One year Wallace=0-11
Arians (5 years)=27-39
Berndt and Dickerson=19-80
Golden=26-23
Two years Addazio=13-11
Total=33 wins, 113 losses
Total=19 wins, 60 losses
Total=107 wins, 91 losses, 3 ties