View this post on Instagram

How did college football get into this mess a lot of us more traditional fans see clear as day now?

Well, it started way back in 1869 as a true amateur sport where students could get some exercise competing in “interesting” athletic competitions with rival schools.

The perfect rivalry in those days was Princeton and another school up the road, Rutgers.

So they started one with a “football” game in 1869.

Nobody was paid. Nobody was expected to be paid.

Then, for the next century or so, the sport lived on under the “amateur” umbrella with as close to a level playing field as possible with every football player getting the same thing–room, board and tuition.

That’s the best way to level the playing field.

That’s how the 1979 Temple team led by Steve Conjar, Brian Broomell and Mark Bright–and an offensive line Joe Paterno called the “best in college football”–came 16 points short of 12-0 and a would-be national championship.

I would have given anything to have witnessed that in real time.

Instead, I lived to see that team go 10-2 and become the first Temple team to win a bowl game, destroying a California team that gave both USC and UCLA a much more competitive game than they did Temple.

That was in Giants Stadium where 52,233 seats were sold but 40,000 Temple fans made it through the turnstiles on a 40-degree day that felt like 20. There might have been 300 California fans there, but I seriously doubt it.

Consolation prize because I know I will exit this world with the most imperfect college football system since 1869.

The most compelling argument for what happened after 1987–when SMU got the “death penalty” for doing what every school does now–has always been, “Well, if coaches can break their contracts to go to other schools without having to sit out a year, so should players.”

My counterpoint was that a contract is a contract and should be honored by both parties until the end of the contract. In other words, BOTH players and coaches should have to sit out a year if they “transfer” and that would end a lot of this current instability we have now.

That probably wouldn’t have withstood the legal system, unfortunately.

Now, everyone–players, coaches, water boys–can move on without consequences.

That doesn’t mean there aren’t regrets on both coaches and players sides.

The biggest Temple football news this week was that Geoff Collins, who holds the unique distinction of being the only Temple coach to NOT have a losing season, said on a national podcast that his “biggest regret was leaving Temple.” The funny thing is that Collins, had he continued those 7- and 8- win type seasons at Temple, would have had a job for life.

Moving up always comes with some risks and Collins found that out the hard way. My feeling was I didn’t like Collins’ OC (Dave Patenaude) but felt he could have done just enough to win and get to bowl games, which should be the goal at Temple.

Still, it’s obvious he had regrets leaving good money at Temple for better money elsewhere.

My guess is that some players have had the same regret, especially Jadan Blue who, after an 81-catch season at Temple, left for a 10-catch season at Virginia Tech. Had Blue duplicated his numbers as a senior there that he did as a junior here, he would have no doubt been an NFL draft choice. Instead, he fell into oblivion.

It’s a cautionary tale for current Temple players who might be thinking the grass is greener outside 10th and Diamond.

Fortunately, the group in the building now seems to have bought into K.C. Keeler’s philosophy. He’s not looking to go anywhere and the players aren’t either. That’s not a culture every other school has right now.

That’s a formula for winning that Temple fans might appreciate come December.

Monday: A Fluid Situation