Key to beating ECU: Temple’s pass rush

Except for the sarcastic “16 people” remark, this is a pretty good analysis.

Eight games into a season should compile enough evidence to determine whether a college football team is good.

Well, all the available metrics indicate that Temple is a pretty good college football team.

Damn good, coached by the winningest active head coach in football, K.C. Keeler. This week we learned coach Keeler reads TFF because he opened up Monday’s press conference by saying “there was no conspiracy to get Hunter Smith a touchdown.” (That was the subject of our Saturday night post, although we used the word “reward” and not conspiracy. No other analysis of the game brought up the Hunter Smith subject other than this space, so thanks K.C. for the shoutout.)

This might have been the year for Temple to play Penn State. ECU, though, is the Super Bowl for Temple now.

Saturday we should find out how good Temple is when the 5-3 Owls, 3-1 in conference host an East Carolina team that is somehow a 4.5-point favorite on the road (2 p.m., ESPN+).

That 4.5 means the nation doesn’t believe yet, even if Philadelphia might.

ECU is also good.

If the Owls are able to beat this team, it’s time to move them to the elite G5 level. That would be Temple winning at home against a team that was a 6.5-point favorite (UTSA), a one-point loss to another 6.5-point favorite (that should have been a win) and a win at home over a 4.5-point favorite (ECU).

Already, Thursday night provided some extra clues about how good Temple is because UTSA beat Tulane, 48-26, Tulane beat Northwestern (23-3) and Northwestern beat Penn State (22-21).

Metrics that matter. Everyone give Matt Gajewski’s YouTube page a thumb’s up and a like. This guy knows his stuff.

Oh yes. We forgot. Tulane beat ECU, 26-19.

Transitive property notwithstanding a number of experts (see above video) have pointed out some metrics that give the Owls important advantages.

The Owls haven’t had a pass rush since the UTSA game and there is a good reason for that in since the guys who were the protagonists in that rush (Sekou Kromah and Sultan Badmus) have been banged and missed a lot of snaps. They are both back and should cause the ECU quarterback to run for his life, just as they did in the second half to Owen McCown of UTSA.

Kromah and Badmus are good to go and that couldn’t come at a better time for Temple.

All things being equal, the ECU offensive line is nowhere near as good as the UTSA line so if the Owls get consistent pressure on Kaitin Houser, he should wilt just like McCown did.

It would help if the 12,500 students who live on campus hop either hop on the subway for the 10-minute ride to Lincoln Financial Field or get one of the hundreds of free buses the university offers every gameday.

Make some noise to get that pass rush juiced. Stand up on every defensive third down.

This is an all-hands-on deck game both the players and the fans so that means players, coaches, alumni, students and Joe Philadelphia fans whose other hometown football team is on a bye this week are all one party on the same project.

Winning, and singing “T for Temple U” afterward.

This is the best chance to date for Temple to show the nation how far it has come in football under the winningest active coach in the NCAA.

Putting the bad guy’s quarterback on his backside early and often will be the key. Mr. Badmus and Mr. Kromah that is your assignment if you chose to accept it, but Mr. Haye, Mr. Stewart, Mr. Morris and others are free to join in as needed.

Late Saturday Night: Game Analysis

9 thoughts on “Key to beating ECU: Temple’s pass rush

  1. ECU 38 – Temple 21

    Shawn Pastor asked Keeler about coming out flat in front of small late crowds. It matters.

    Reporters are asking ECU players how they intend to bring energy in a stadium less than 20% full. They have had 16 days to think of everything.

    Temple comes out flat, at home, again in front of a sparse crowd. On to West Point vs Army.

    • Temple 27, ECU 20. The 128th-ranked offensive line has no answers for the 59th-ranked pass rush of Kromah, Badmus, Morris, Haye and Stewart. Eight sacks of Howser with at least one forced INT and one strip sack. 4-1 in the league and on to Army. Crowd will be larger than the 12,131 who witnessed the beatdown of UTSA.

  2. One caveat: If we come out in the White helmets, we lose, 27-20. From watching the Halloween video on the Temple football twitter page, that looks like the uniform combination of the week.

    • smh.., Temple has worn cherry helmets 5 times this year, won 4 games and had Navy beat. Who is making the uniform call?

      Temple will lose in white helmets, and deservedly so.., so stupid. They wore white helmets last year vs ECU and got spanked. Is it me? I canʻt be the only one seeing this…,

      • It’s not just you. Our entire tailgate crew prefer the Cherry helmets. You look sharp you play sharp. You look stupid you play stupid.

      • K.C. saw our Hunter Smith post and opened his press conference disputing it on Monday. If he sees this now, there is still time to give the order to equipment to pack the Cherry helmets.

  3. Not invented here.., how much could Temple save next year by wearing just one helmet? Use the savings to increase the player revenue share. Every dollar counts.

    I donʻt understand the stubbornness. Does someone have a better idea to instantly increase the revenue share by the same amount?

  4. Not going to mince words here: The White helmets look like total shit. Not partial shit. Total shit.

  5. On to Army in Cherry Helmets. ECU was just the better team. We tried hard. We’ll get them next time.

Leave a reply to Mike Gibson Cancel reply